Lenses

There has always been one lens that you have to own for your Micro Four Thirds camera, the Panasonic 20mm F1.7. Why? Because it is small, light, takes great images and can be had for a reasonable price. And now there is a second must-have, the Olympus 45mm F1.8. Why? Because it is small, light, takes great images and can be had for a reasonable price.

I don’t have it yet because I couldn’t find any stock in Pattaya or Thailand my finances do not permit another lens purchase at the moment; but Nik has acquired one and lent it to me for a couple of hours this morning.

First impressions; this thing really is small and it really is light.

Here it is next to the Panasonic 14-45, set at 45mm:

Although it is light, it feels well built, and the focusing ring is silky smooth. Time to take some photos. This lens has been touted as being good for portraiture, being an ideal focal length and with F1.8 to help throw the background out of focus (if you don’t understand that, read this). Sadly, I have nobody to take portrait photos of at the moment and I reckoned that the cats didn’t count; so I headed out to Nong Nuch for yet another flower shoot.

The lens was quick and accurate to auto-focus on my two year old Panasonic GF1, it must really fly on the latest bodies. Manual focusing was easy, with a crisp in-focus position being easy to spot. And having only 12 grammes of lens on the camera amplified the light delight that is shooting with Micro Four Thirds.

Image quality? Impressive. Here’s a shot with a 100% crop shown after, the details on the insect’s wings and legs are quite clear.


Panasonic GF1 with Olympus 45mm at F3.5


Click on the image to see full size.

I played around with the lens for an hour or so and really enjoyed using it; definitely a must-have piece of equipment. Problem is, I already have a 45mm lens, the classic and wonderful Contax 45mm. Takes lovely photos, but it is manual focus only so it does not get used as much as it should.

Fortunately, there is a solution. The most excellent Spacefruit; polo player, bon viveur and possessor of enormous genitals (allegedly), has taken it upon himself to gather around his ample girth the world’s production of Contax 45mm lenses. If one appears on eBay, he buys it. His intention is to produce a shortage such that prices skyrocket; then he can dump the whole lot for a fat profit. He was happy to buy my Contax for nearly the same price as an Olympus 45mm would cost me; and so I hope to be a proud owner soon and further photos will follow. In the meantime, here are some more from this morning, all taken with the Olympus lens.

Tasty bokeh:

Panasonic GF1 with Olympus 45mm at F2.5


Panasonic GF1 with Olympus 45mm at F1.8


Panasonic GF1 with Olympus 45mm at F1.8


Panasonic GF1 with Olympus 45mm at F1.8


Panasonic GF1 with Olympus 45mm at F1.8


Panasonic GF1 with Olympus 45mm at F1.8


Panasonic GF1 with Olympus 45mm at F5.6

Thank you Nik for the loan of the lens. Please buy the new Olympus 12mm next so I can borrow that too.

The Son and his beloved expressed an interest to visit a sea turtle conservation centre. No problem, except it was slap bang in the middle of a navy base.

Nothing daunted, we rolled up at the entrance to the base and were halted by a man with a big gun. We were then directed to a guard house where another man with a big gun, even bigger muscles, and a truckload of communication equipment looked at us with weary eyes. The conversation went something like this:

Man with big gun: I will need an ID card for the Thais, and the passport from each of the farangs.
She who must be obeyed: I left my ID at home and the farangs don’t have their passports. But, on a brighter note, you can have the farang driver’s driving licence.
MWBG: Surely you must have your ID card with you?
SWMBO: No, sorry.
MWBG: And you should know that farangs must surrender their passports to enter military facilities.
SWMBO: Yes, I know, sorry.
MWBG: So there is no way I can let you in with just a farang driving licence.
SWMBO: Oh, go on, please.
MWBG: Oh, alright then.

So wonderfully Thai.

As was the turtle conservation facility which consisted of a small building with a rather crap display and an area with tanks containing turtles of various sizes.

Completing our outing was a visit to the Black Monk Temple, so named (I assume) because there a couple of black coloured statues outside. Quite an interesting facade on the temple which I decided would be a good subject for the Pinwide “lens”.

My $17 macro solution is all well and good if you want to take photos really close up in the studio; but bugger all use in the real world. There is the Panasonic Leica 45mm macro; but that will set you back around $800. Alternatively, you can choose from a wide range of legacy lenses and buy an adapter for micro four thirds. Nik had struck lucky on eBay and found a 55mm Yashica macro; and was very happy with his purchase. So I waited for another one to appear and snapped it up for 4,000 baht.

Not had a chance to use it anger before today, but this morning it was off to Nong Nuch with Ian, the man who is rather good at capturing small beasts with his camera.

Ian was keen to show me his new camera bag. Being a canny Scotsman, he is not famous for acquiring anything new, so a replacement camera bag was indeed an event; especially as his previous “bag” had been a piece of bubble wrap. True to form, the new bag turned out to be a fresh sheet of bubble wrap.

He turned up with a disc of bagpipe music to play on the journey. Fortunately, I had prepared for this and had my wife primed to inform Ian that the CD player in the car was broken; so we were spared the pain.

Luckily we found a couple of beasts to photograph. There was a frog:

Suspiciously bubbly at the rear end I thought.

Then we found a damselfly which conveniently sat still for several minutes so we could both have a go at shooting it:

After that, there was a small flying thing (that’s as precise as I can be) with legs laden with pollen, deep in the heart of an orchid:

Finished off with a few obligatory flower shots before heading for home:

Very pleased with the Yashica, and equally pleased that I was not subjected to bagpipe music; you really can’t ask much more than that of a morning.

Whilst some of the world are celebrating something to do with Jesus and his amazing egg-laden bunnies; there’s a hard-core of crazies who recognise today as Worldwide Pinhole Photography day.

A pinhole photograph is created by using a tiny hole to allow light onto the film or sensor. There is no lens, just the hole. The principle was discovered by the Chinese (who else?) about 500 years before Jesus and his bunnies appeared; and pinhole cameras have been around for more than a hundred years.

Nowadays, if you want to take pinhole photographs, you make your own camera. Pringles cans are popular as the basis, or you can just poke a hole on an old lens cap and stick it on your regular camera. Or, if you have a Micro Four Thirds camera, you can now buy a custom designed pinhole, called a Pinwide, from Wanderlust Cameras.

Why pay $40 when you can make one yourself? Well, the hole on the Pinwide has been etched to an exact size to give the best possible image; and the Pinwide hole is recessed deep into the camera so you obtain a very wide field of view and gather the maximum light. Plus it comes in a very attractive tin box, and you can never have too many attractive tin boxes.

The first thing you notice is how tiny the hole is. On a normal lens, F/16 is probably about as small as you would go:

But that’s the light of ten thousand suns compared to the teeny tiny hole in the Pinwide:


The actual hole is the tiny black dot inside the grey area inside the white area. It’s small!

The manufacturers rate it as something between F/96 and F/128, depending on which part of the sensor you read from. Whatever the number, you are going to need a tripod or very steady hands and a high ISO, but on the plus side you are going to produce images where everything is in focus due to the resulting infinite depth of field.

However, don’t get excited about the “in focus” bit. Without a lens, the resulting images will be very soft, almost dreamlike, in quality; which of course is part of the attraction.

Shooting with the Pinwide is very easy. Stick the camera on manual, adjust the shutter speed to match the exposure, and shoot. No focusing required.

The results are technically poor compared to using a proper lens; but that’s not the point. With the soft focus, slightly distorted colours, heavy vignetting and a photo where everything is as sharp as everything else; it is not difficult to produce something that looks different and maybe even looks interesting (if only to you). Personally I like the look a lot and have spent the last couple of afternoons with the Pinwide and a tripod. I think the results are fun, your mileage may vary.

Micro Four Thirds rocks. Thirty year old Russian lenses, cinema and TV lenses, state of the art Voigtlander lenses; there is such a wide range of offerings. And now you can slap on a tiny hole and go create your own weird bits of art. How’s that for a happy Easter?

Nik goes a bit crazy when looking for lenses on eBay. Apart from buying coffee cups by mistake, he has a tendency to turn all hot and sweaty over long lens. Clearly it is a penile envy issue, further evidenced by his suggestion of the title for this post.

Usually, I am able to dissuade him from purchasing replica willies, which will look and act ridiculous on our tiny Panasonic cameras; but I failed to stop his latest acquisition, a 400mm Sigma lens originally designed to sit on a Canon film camera.

Notice the slight droop at the end; Nik assures me that this is his normal experience.

The lens cost him thirty pounds, and the adapter to make it work on a Panasonic double the price; but now he has an 800mm effective length lens, with plans to knock that up to 1600mm with a 2x adapter. And why on earth would he want such a beast? Apparently so he can sit on his balcony and capture the antics of the Russian tourists on the beach, such as the below which he proudly sent me this morning:

The image quality is not that great, but you can’t expect much for thirty pounds, and, given the subject matter, a razor-sharp image might offer more than we would wish to see.

I really have to stay away from eBay…..

The latest indiscretion arrived this afternoon, a Navitar 75mm F1.3. Apparently good for portraits; but most of the appeal (to me) is how cool an enormous chunk of glass looks, hanging off the front of my camera. How could I resist for $125?
I couldn’t.

“And what’s the camera resting on?” I hear you not asking. That would be a Yashica 55mm macro that arrived yesterday. I’m sick I tell you.

I wanted to test the Navitar’s portrait abilities on she who must be obeyed, but she declined, quoting some urgent Pet Society action that she had to attend to. So I had to make do with one of her dolls.

P1150790

My photo cabinet is now full so I have to stop buying lenses. Although I suppose I could always buy another photo cabinet…..

Off to the airport to collect The Son and his girlfriend. Worried unnecessarily about being late; only for the excellent immigration service at the airport to impose a one hour delay courtesy of massive queues.

Home eventually and it was time to compare lens collections, and receive an offering of chocolate; sufficient to keep me in calories until genuinej passes this way again:

Also in the goodies box was a very cute little 25mm lens:

Chocolate and photography; my son knows how to keep his father happy.

Of course, it’s all about the 0.95. That’s the F stop by the way, the indicator of how much light can be captured by the lens. In the world of photography, you think you are doing pretty well if your lens is F2.8, you are starting to pay serious money for F2, and if you want to get down to F1.2, then you will need a very flexible credit card. But 0.95? Forget it, unless you fancy giving Mr. Leica $11,000 for the privilege.

So when Voigtlander announced this lens, designed specifically for M4/3, much lust was generated. More lust than Voigtlander expected perhaps, because they can’t make enough of them. The Voigtlander dealer for Thailand is AV camera, and their first two batches of twenty pieces sold out in two days. The third batch was an order for forty pieces, Voigtlander sent ten, and they were sold within two hours of arrival in the shop. Fortunately, I had left a deposit to secure one, and $899 (27,800 baht in real money) later, I was walking out with a Voigtlander box under my arm.

In the box you will find the lens with a cap, plus a hood and a separate larger cap to fit the hood. This is good because you can never have enough lens caps with the word Voigtlander stamped on them.

The lens itself is quite heavy and beautifully made. The focus ring is silky smooth with a long travel and the F stop ring has a satisfying click to it. Apart from the hood and caps, there is no plastic here; the lens is a gorgeous creation in metal and glass. As well as no plastic, there are also no electronics; this lens is completely manual in operation. Fortunately, M4/3 cameras are designed to be used in manual mode and using the Voigtlander is a delight, provided you are not in a rush. Set the camera to A mode and ensure “shoot with no lens” is enabled. Set the F stop at 0.95 and focus, then turn the F stop as required and shoot.

I don’t mind shooting manually, but I do wish they had built in sufficient electronics so that the F stop and the name of the lens were embedded in my images. Resorting to a little notepad to record F stops is a step backwards.

So, how does the lens perform? In normal light, the obvious comparison would be against the Panasonic 20mm F1.7; generally regarded as the best M4/3 lens. I have run a few direct comparison tests and I reckon that the Voigtlander is slightly better. But there is not much in it and the Panasonic has the advantage of being tiny and offering auto-focus; and it’s cheaper. So, as a walk-around lens, you can’t beat the Panasonic 20mm; but you don’t buy the Voightlander as a walk-around lens. You buy it for when there is almost no light, for when you want to create crazy bokeh, and when you want to go out and shoot with a “real” lens attached to your camera.

In low light, this lens allows you to keep on shooting without having to raise ISO. It was late afternoon in the crocodile pen when this was taken, but enough light when shooting at F0.95.

Not much light in a shopping mall, and a coffee cup is not much of a subject, but the background lights look good a F1.4

Take it out at night, and the bokeh from lights really comes into its own:

If the mood takes you; just throw everything out of focus and generate a bokeh Xmas tree:

Sometimes, shooting wide open can be too much. The depth of field is tiny, especially if you are close to your subject (and this lens can get very close). Only the lip of this glass is in focus:

Shooting these candles at F0.95 produces some very blobby candles:

Stopping down to F1.4 works better:

Generally, I found that stopping down to F1.4 or more gave a better photo, F0.95 is a little soft and provides such a very small depth of field. But it is good to know that the extra light is there if you need it.

The Voigtlander 25mm is a lens made in the classic style and, as such, it is a pleasure to own and use. Image quality is excellent from F1.4 and up, and F0.95 allows shooting in very low light and produces wonderful bokeh, especially of light sources. If I was only allowed to carry one lens, and did not need the speed of auto-focus; this is the lens I would take.

She who must be obeyed has a notebook in which she enters details of things she wants to photograph. Some time ago we were wandering around Nong Nuch gardens and she announced:

I want to photograph a Habitas.
You mean a house, a habitat?
No, a Habitas.
I have no idea what you are talking about.
A Habitas!! Look, I have a picture of one in my notebook. {She shows me a photo of a Hibiscus}.
Ah, you mean a Hibiscus.
Yes, exactly, a Habitas.

And from that day forward, a Habitas is what we have called it; it’s just easier.

We have a couple of Habistases (Habitus? Habiti?) on our balcony; so I thought I would celebrate my first free day for a while by taking some photos, and looking at a Habitas through a variety of lenses.

I decided to shoot in order of lens cost; so first of all we have the rather expensive Voightlander 25mm:

Next up is the cheaper but almost as wonderful Panasonic 20mm:

Our next contender is the decidedly weird, but occasionally wonderful, Angenieux 16-78mm. The vignetting is not added, it just does that because it wants to; and if you don’t like it, that’s just tough (it’s French):


Then we tumble down into the cheapo world of legacy obscurity and the Isco Gottingen Westromat 50mm, yours for a shade over 2,000 baht:

If the Isco is too much of a mouthful, how about the Canon 50mm for a similar price?:

And if 2,000 baht is still above your budget; then there is always the Russian Industar 22 50mm for less than $30.

Its a bit soft, but that works quite well with a Habitas.

So which is best? There’s no answer to that; whichever pleases you most. But the exercise did raise an interesting question: why the hell do I have so many lenses (and I didn’t use all of them)?

All shots with the Panasonic GF1

Outraged outburst from Billy following my use of the ‘p’ word when describing a lens in a recent post.

So, toning it down a bit, here are some photos from the lens that looks like a dick.

Zoomed in, there is a little vignetting:

Zoomed out, the vignetting becomes a circle:

But it doesn’t matter, because the bokeh is amazing:

All in all, a really fun lens.

If you like the look of what this lens can produce, I am pleased to tell you that there is one available on eBay at a reasonable price regret to advise that there are none available on eBay.